Solar energy paper index
Assessment of energy storage operational carbon emissions using time varying emission factors
One-line summary
A solar energy research paper on Assessment of energy storage operational carbon emissions using time varying emission factors.
Engineering notes
Engineering notes will be added by the Power for Solar editorial team.
Chinese explanation / 中文解读
中文解读待补充:本站会优先为光伏效率、钙钛矿太阳能电池、储能技术、太阳能热利用、BIPV、并网技术等高价值论文补充中文说明。
Original abstract
The widespread deployment of Energy Storage Systems (ESSs) is critical for renewable energy integration and power system decarbonization. However, the net carbon impact of ESS operation remains debatable, particularly in fossil-fuel-dependent grids. This study develops a dynamic assessment framework using time-varying carbon intensity signals to evaluate the operational carbon footprint of ESSs, employing the 2022 Jiangsu Provincial grid as a case study. We construct annual hourly net load profiles and simulate the dispatch of two representative ESSs-Pumped Hydro Storage (PHS) and Battery Energy Storage (BES)-for peak shaving and valley filling. Results show that the PHS system, with its inflexible dispatch and lower round-trip efficiency, generated a net positive carbon emission intensity. Conversely, the highly flexible BES system, with superior efficiency, achieved a net negative intensity, reducing overall emissions. Sensitivity analysis reveals that higher renewable penetration enhances the carbon abatement potential of BES, while extending storage duration beyond 4 h diminishes marginal returns due to increased energy losses and suboptimal dispatch. These findings underscore that operational flexibility, system efficiency, and alignment with dynamic carbon signals are paramount for maximizing the environmental benefits of energy storage.
Links and sources
Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?
Power for Solar can prepare a custom solar energy literature review, simulation code map, dataset map, and B2B photovoltaic technology assessment.
Request B2B research
Comments