Averaging favors MPC: How typical evaluation setups overstate MPC performance for residential battery scheduling

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the Power for Solar editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为光伏效率、钙钛矿太阳能电池、储能技术、太阳能热利用、BIPV、并网技术等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Residential prosumers with PV-battery systems increasingly manage their electricity exchange with the power grid to minimize costs. This study investigates the performance of Model Predictive Control (MPC) and Rule-Based Control (RBC) under 15/30/60 min averaging commonly used in research, when Net Billing and battery degradation are considered. We simulate five consecutive months for 15 buildings in northern Germany, generating costs at up to 1-min resolution while scheduling at 15/30/60 min. We find that time-averaged evaluations make MPC look consistently better than RBC, yet when costs are recomputed at minute-level ground-truth, the reported advantage shrinks by 69% on average for hourly schedulers. For individual buildings, the finer evaluation can reverse conclusions, and simple RBC can achieve lower total costs than an MPC with perfect foresight. These findings caution against drawing conclusions from coarse averages and show how a fair assessment of battery scheduling approaches can be obtained.

Links and sources

• PDF from original source

Comments