Beyond monomial $α$-attractors

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the Power for Solar editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为光伏效率、钙钛矿太阳能电池、储能技术、太阳能热利用、BIPV、并网技术等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Recent small-scale CMB data show a preference for larger scalar spectral index, $n_s$, when combined with DESI data. Monomial $α$-attractor T-models can be reconciled with the new observations if the power of the hyperbolic tangent function is $p\geq 6$, where $p$ is even. The supergravity construction of monomial T-models with $p>2$ relies on the assumption that lower powers remain negligible over the whole field range explored during inflation and reheating. What would be the consequences of going beyond the monomial formulation? As a first step in this direction, we consider the case of a binomial potential, given by the sum of quadratic and quartic terms. When the quartic coefficient, $c$, is $0< c+1/2 \ll 1$, we find that the new model displays non-universal behavior for $n_s$, leading to values as large as $0.965$ and with an $α$-dependence that is qualitatively different from that of monomial potentials. By solving the background dynamics during the first few e-folds of perturbative reheating we show that the quartic term might dominate before the quadratic one eventually takes over as the inflaton oscillations decrease in amplitude. This leads to a time-dependent equation of state, with $\bar w\sim 1/3$ initially before ultimately $\bar w\to 0$. Obtaining a quartic-dominated reheating stage lasting $\sim4$ e-folds requires a substantial hierarchy between the quartic and quadratic terms, $c\sim 10^5$ for $α\gtrsim 0.1$. Our study highlights that models beyond the monomial form can lead to non-trivial deviations of $n_s$ from the predictions of monomial potentials. Furthermore our results for $\bar w$ during reheating call into question the use of monomial models with large $p$; assuming that $\bar w$ is uniquely determined by the $p$-th power relies on substantial fine-tuning of the underlying supergravity potential.

Links and sources

• Official / arXiv page
• PDF from original source

Comments