Comparative Assessment of Space-Based Solar Power and Terrestrial Photovoltaic Systems

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the Power for Solar editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为光伏效率、钙钛矿太阳能电池、储能技术、太阳能热利用、BIPV、并网技术等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Sunlight in geostationary orbit arrives at approximately 1,361 W/m², unfiltered by atmosphere, uninterrupted by weather, and available for roughly 99% of the year. On Earth's surface, the same resource averages 150–300 W/m² at mid-latitudes after accounting for atmosphere, cloud, and the diurnal cycle. That gap, nearly an order of magnitude, is the central premise of Space-Based Solar Power (SBSP): collect energy where it is abundant, transmit it wirelessly to where it is needed. This paper quantifies that premise, challenges it economically, and asks whether it survives scrutiny. Using data from NASA, JAXA, ESA, IRENA, and NREL, we show that GEO SBSP concepts could deliver 6–10 times more annual energy per unit collector area than utility-scale terrestrial PV. The cost gap, however, is just as dramatic, NASA's 2024 baseline LCOE for SBSP sits at $0.61–$1.59/kWh, against a global weighted average of $0.043/kWh for terrestrial PV per IRENA's latest figures. The paper also examines two issues the existing literature tends to treat briefly: the specific debris and collision risks posed by deploying large structures in LEO and GEO, and the cost and power expectations for SBSP systems at different scales. A comparative assessment against conventional and modern generation technologies closes the paper, establishing what, precisely, makes SBSP unique and under what conditions it could become competitive.

Links and sources

• PDF from original source

Comments