Solar energy paper index
Constraining dark energy with complementary probes of large-scale structure
One-line summary
A solar energy research paper on Constraining dark energy with complementary probes of large-scale structure.
Engineering notes
Engineering notes will be added by the Power for Solar editorial team.
Chinese explanation / 中文解读
中文解读待补充：本站会优先为光伏效率、钙钛矿太阳能电池、储能技术、太阳能热利用、BIPV、并网技术等高价值论文补充中文说明。
Original abstract
To observationally pin down the nature of dark energy, it is essential to consistently model cosmological perturbations in the presence of dark energy alongside the background expansion and constrain this joint theory space with a large array of complementary probes. Here, we achieve this by constraining a model in the Effective Field Theory of Dark Energy (EFTofDE) framework by supplementing probes of the expansion history with several probes of large-scale structure: redshift space distortions (RSD) from DESI DR1, $3\times2$pt measurements from DES Y3, and the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect from cross-correlating CMB temperature anisotropies with galaxy number counts or CMB lensing. We demonstrate the complementarity of different probes which leads to strong improvements on constraints on DE perturbations. For our most constraining dataset combination that supplements CMB+BAO+SNe probes with DESI DR1 RSD, DES Y3 $3\times2$pt and ISW cross-correlations between CMB temperature and galaxy counts, we find an improvement in the Figure of Merit (FoM) for the DE perturbation parameters $\{c_B, c_M\}$ by a factor of 2.69. We show the phenomenological implications of these constraints by mapping them to the present-day values of the phenomenological functions $\{μ(z), Σ(z)\}$, where we see an FoM improvement by a factor of 3.37. We find a significant interdependence between the posteriors of $\{w_0, w_a\}$ and $\{c_B, c_M\}$, caused by the theoretical prior imposed by the gradient stability condition within the EFTofDE framework. Finally, we compute the significance of deviation from $Λ$CM for the EFTofDE model when constrained with CMB+BAO+SNe datasets, finding it to be at 2.9$σ$. This significance is nontrivially similar to the significance for the $w_0w_a$CDM model for the same dataset combination which we find to be 3.1$σ$.
Links and sources
Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?
Power for Solar can prepare a custom solar energy literature review, simulation code map, dataset map, and B2B photovoltaic technology assessment.
Request B2B research
Comments