Decentralized, centralized, and hierarchical coordination of residential DERs in three-phase unbalanced distribution networks: a comparative analysis

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the Power for Solar editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为光伏效率、钙钛矿太阳能电池、储能技术、太阳能热利用、BIPV、并网技术等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

The increasing use of residential distributed energy resources (DERs), including photovoltaic generation, electric vehicles, stationary batteries, and flexible electric water heaters, is changing the operation of low-voltage distribution networks. These resources can reduce household electricity costs and provide demand-side flexibility; however, uncoordinated operation can result in voltage deviations, network congestion, line overloading, and stress on distribution transformers. This paper presents a comparison of three DER coordination architectures: decentralized household-level optimization, centralized feeder-level optimal power flow (OPF), and hierarchical aggregator-based coordination. The benchmark is conducted on a three-phase low-voltage distribution network with 157 residential households over a 24-h horizon. The decentralized architecture optimizes each household individually, and the resulting network behavior is validated in OpenDSS. In the centralized architecture, detailed household DER models are integrated into a nonlinear AC-OPF formulation. The hierarchical architecture coordinates prosumer flexibility using local flexibility estimation, network-level activation, allocation, household-level tracking, and final OpenDSS validation. For the studied feeder, the results indicate that the hierarchical architecture provides the most favorable trade-off between customer economics and network performance among the three architectures considered, based on the final household schedules validated through OpenDSS power-flow replay. Compared with decentralized control, it decreases the mean daily household electricity cost from 6.74 to 6.14 GBP/home/day (an 8.9% reduction), reduces network peak demand by 20.4%, reduces the worst line-loading ratio by 15.3%, and reduces transformer loading by 19.0%. In this case study, all 157 households obtain lower daily electricity bills than under the decentralized baseline, indicating that the incentive-based coordination mechanism can align network-level objectives with individual customer benefits under the modeled conditions. The centralized OPF achieves the strongest nominal network performance but relies on restrictive assumptions regarding full DER observability and controllability and does not provide the same customer-level autonomy, compensation, or implementation pathway as the hierarchical framework; it is therefore treated as an idealized network benchmark rather than a directly deployable controller. Overall, the results suggest that DER coordination strategies should be assessed using a holistic framework that considers customer cost, network security, flexibility realization, fairness, computational effort, and physical validation, and that, under this broader evaluation, hierarchical coordination offers a practical compromise between decentralized autonomy and centralized optimality for the studied network.

Links and sources

• PDF from original source

Comments