Dust Formation in Common Envelope Binary Interactions -- III. Lightcurves

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the Power for Solar editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为光伏效率、钙钛矿太阳能电池、储能技术、太阳能热利用、BIPV、并网技术等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Luminous red novae are transient events thought to arise from common envelope binary interactions. In this paper, we perform post-processing light-curve calculations for two, 3D hydrodynamic simulations of common envelope events. These simulations model interactions between 1.7 $M_\odot$ and 3.7 $M_\odot$ asymptotic giant branch stars and a 0.6 $M_\odot$ compact companion, including dust nucleation. In both our simulations, which are carried out for 44 years under adiabatic conditions, we observe a bright, hot peak lasting $3-5$ years, primarily due to the expansion of the photosphere before and during inspiral. Additional peaks can be seen appearing at different times and for different viewing angles, due to the asymmetry of the interaction. Dust forms about $1-3$ years after the beginning of the simulated interaction and shortly afterwards we witness a sharp decline in the bolometric luminosity, followed by a partial recovery and a plateau with an effective temperature of $\sim$400 K. The dust photosphere reaches a size of $\sim$250 au by the end of the simulations, but we predict that between 100 and 200 years, the dust will become optically thin at visible wavelengths, revealing an inner, warmer photosphere. The lightcurves obtained have two, well-quantified, but large uncertainties: insufficient surface resolution primarily affecting the first 1-2 years of the simulated lightcurves and the adiabatic assumption that affects primarily the later years. We finally contextualise our simulations within a group of observed luminous red nova transients, drawing particular attention to the outburst of OGLE-2002-BLG-360 and AT 2025abao, which are the closest match to our simulation.

Links and sources

• Official / arXiv page
• PDF from original source

Comments