Effective reheating in Gauss--Bonnet inflation with $μ(φ,X)$ coupling

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the Power for Solar editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为光伏效率、钙钛矿太阳能电池、储能技术、太阳能热利用、BIPV、并网技术等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

We study effective reheating in a scalar--Gauss--Bonnet inflationary model with a phase-space-dependent coupling $μ(φ,X)$, in which a compact field-space feature is combined with a bounded kinetic gate. The modified inflationary background determines the pivot-scale quantities and the effective energy density at the end of inflation. These quantities are then used to derive the reheating duration $N_{\rm re}$ and temperature $T_{\rm re}$ through the thermal-history matching relation. We first perform two fixed-pivot reference scans by varying the overall Gauss--Bonnet strength $λ_{\rm GB}$ and the kinetic parameter $g_{_X}$ separately. For the reference parameter choices, increasing either parameter increases $N_{\rm re}$ and decreases $T_{\rm re}$ for the selected reheating equations of state. Additional benchmark calculations clarify how these variations depend on the dynamical regime of the model. In the $λ_{\rm GB}$ scan, the increase in $N_{\rm re}$ and the decrease in $T_{\rm re}$ persist, although both variations become strongly suppressed when the coupling is more localized or when the end of inflation is controlled more strongly by the E-model potential. In the $g_{_X}$ scan, stronger field-space localization and kinetic saturation can instead lead to a slight decrease in $N_{\rm re}$ and an increase in $T_{\rm re}$ as $g_{_X}$ is increased. When the bounded kinetic contribution is considered together with a weaker overall Gauss--Bonnet interaction, the resulting changes in the reheating quantities become nearly negligible. The fixed-pivot predictions of the representative and alternative benchmarks are compared with CMB constraints.These reheating constraints are then discussed for four representative values of the effective equation-of-state parameter, $\overline{w}_{\rm re}=-1/3,0,2/3,$ and $1$.

Links and sources

• Official / arXiv page
• PDF from original source

Comments