Integrated physics-based modeling reveals a thermodynamic gap in small modular reactor load following

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the Power for Solar editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为光伏效率、钙钛矿太阳能电池、储能技术、太阳能热利用、BIPV、并网技术等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Small modular reactors (SMRs) are increasingly considered for flexible power generation; however, many dynamic studies still neglect the thermodynamic coupling between the primary and secondary loops that is essential for accurate assessment of load-following capability. In this study, we develop a hybrid dynamic framework that couples an equation-based model of the NuScale integral pressurized water reactor, including the reactor, primary loop, and moving-boundary helical-coil once-through steam generator, with a physics-based secondary steam cycle comprising the valve, turbine, condenser, and feedwater pump. This approach enforces mass and energy conservation across the coupled system while preserving physically consistent flow interactions across the domain boundary. The integrated model reproduces nominal design-point conditions and is used to analyze a 5% step load rejection under five control strategies, including a decentralized three-loop control architecture for the valve, feedwater pump, and control rods. The results show that partial control strategies are insufficient for efficient and safe operation, whereas simultaneous action of all three actuators stabilizes steam pressure, limits adverse thermal excursions in the primary loop and maintains acceptable steam generator operating margins during load-following maneuvers. Compared with a conventional linear steam-cycle representation, the coupled framework captures dynamic back-pressure and variable turbine enthalpy drop that are otherwise neglected, leading to different predictions of transient behavior and required steam flow. These findings show that thermodynamically coupled, physics-based steam-cycle models are needed for more accurate assessment of the operational flexibility, efficiency and safety margins of SMRs under realistic load-following conditions.

Links and sources

• Official / arXiv page
• PDF from original source

Comments