Low-Emission Logistics: A Model for Optimizing Electric Truck Routes and Charging Stations, Integrating Solar Energy

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the Power for Solar editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为光伏效率、钙钛矿太阳能电池、储能技术、太阳能热利用、BIPV、并网技术等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

The rapid electrification of urban freight transport requires new optimization approaches that jointly consider logistics operations and energy system constraints. The problem is formulated as a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model that captures the interdependencies between vehicle operations, battery constraints, charging infrastructure availability and the temporal variability of photovoltaic energy. A multi-objective structure is adopted to minimize total energy costs and CO2 emissions while maximizing the utilization of locally generated renewable energy. The model is evaluated using scenario-based simulations under three solar integration levels (0%, 30% and 60%). The results demonstrate that integrating solar energy into routing and charging decisions significantly reduces grid dependency, lowers emissions and improves overall system efficiency. Three types of charging stations are considered in the study (S1, S2, and S3), differing in photovoltaic (PV) energy penetration levels, ranging from conventional grid-based charging (S1) to high renewable integration stations (S3). The quantitative analysis reveals a clear resource and emission structure across the simulated scenarios. Incorporating charging stops grid-wide increases the total distance from theoretical routes to real tracks with stops to overcome the 120 kW battery limit. However, the integration of solar energy significantly alters the system’s environmental costs: total CO2 emissions drop non-linearly by 33.4%, decreasing from 364.64 kg in the ‘Low Sun’ scenario to 243 kg in the ‘High Sun’ scenario. Furthermore, the localized impact shows that utilizing pure grid energy (S1) results in 405 kg of CO2, while maximizing solar integration up to 60% (S3) reduces emissions to 162 kg. The sensitivity analysis showed how varying the share of solar energy at the two main stations (S2 and S3) affects the total CO2 emissions, while maintaining the same routes. Three scenarios were examined: low (10% and 30%), base (30% and 60%) and high (50% and 90%) solar energy shares. As the share of solar energy in the system increases, a clear effect of emission reduction and energy cost optimization is observed.

Links and sources

Comments