Solar energy paper index

Minimising magnetic activity effects in PLATO observations: insights from the Sun-as-a-star

2026-06-15 · arXiv: 2606.16450

One-line summary

A solar energy research paper on Minimising magnetic activity effects in PLATO observations: insights from the Sun-as-a-star.

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the Power for Solar editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充:本站会优先为光伏效率、钙钛矿太阳能电池、储能技术、太阳能热利用、BIPV、并网技术等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Recent studies showed that magnetic activity effects in solar-type stars can substantially bias seismic inferences, particularly age estimates, regardless of modelling strategy or surface treatment. We quantified how magnetic activity effects in the Sun-as-a-star are smoothed by temporal averaging by analysing 182.5-, 365-, 730-, and 1460-day time series from the BiSON network and the GOLF instrument. We estimated the activity-induced systematic uncertainty using two metrics and compared results across baselines to evaluate how the observing window shapes activity-induced biases. Solar-cycle signatures persist even in 1460-day windows. The suppression of magnetic activity effects with increasing baseline is non-monotonic: one- and four-year windows reduce biases far more effectively than shorter baselines in most cases, whereas 730-day windows provide only limited improvement over 365-day ones. Improvements arise from enhanced frequency determination (dominant at 365 days) and from increasingly efficient temporal averaging of the activity cycle (dominant at 1460 days). In contrast, 730-day is an intermediate regime: frequency accuracy has already plateaued and the observing window remains too short to smooth out cycle-related variability. On average, we find that magnetic activity effects decrease by 24%, 12%, 30%, and 38% when transitioning from 182.5 to 365 days, 365 to 730 days, 730 to 1460 days, and 365 to 1460 days for frequency-based fits; the corresponding improvements for ratio-based fits are 13%, 14%, 20%, and 31%. These results indicate that a continuous single-field four-year PLATO observing programme would provide the most effective suppression of magnetic-activity biases for solar analogues, whereas a 2+2-year strategy (in two distinct fields) is significantly more sensitive to magnetic effects, with limited gains between 365- and 730-day windows.

5.0Engineering value
7.0Research novelty
4.0Business relevance

Links and sources

Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?

Power for Solar can prepare a custom solar energy literature review, simulation code map, dataset map, and B2B photovoltaic technology assessment.

Request B2B research

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this paper.
Login or register to leave a comment