Solar energy paper index
Near 13% efficient semitransparent Cu(In,Ga)S2 solar cells with band gap of 1.6 eV on transparent back contact
One-line summary
A solar energy research paper on Near 13% efficient semitransparent Cu(In,Ga)S2 solar cells with band gap of 1.6 eV on transparent back contact.
Engineering notes
Engineering notes will be added by the Power for Solar editorial team.
Chinese explanation / 中文解读
中文解读待补充:本站会优先为光伏效率、钙钛矿太阳能电池、储能技术、太阳能热利用、BIPV、并网技术等高价值论文补充中文说明。
Original abstract
Wide-gap Cu(In,Ga)S2 solar cells with In2O3:Sn (ITO) as transparent back contact are evaluated for the application as top cells in tandem devices. The effect of Na on the solar cell performance is investigated by supplying additional Na by NaF co-evaporation or exclusively by Na diffusion from glass. An efficiency of 12.7% is achieved for a semitransparent solar cell with a band gap of 1.6 eV, with sufficient Na diffusion from glass only, allowed by a thin ITO layer. Absorber grown with additional NaF co-evaporation during Cu(In,Ga)S2 growth on thicker ITO show a comparable efficiency of 12%. High temperature growth at Tsub = 630°C enhances overall absorber quality and results in wide-gap absorbers, with photoluminescence quantum yield improved to 1.5 x 10-5, two orders of magnitude higher than absorber grown at low temperature. NaF co-evaporation is effective in suppressing deep defects, thereby reducing non-radiative recombination and enhancing photoluminescence quantum yield further. A GaOx interfacial layer is formed at the rear contact, likely contributing to the passivation of the back contact. With the presence of thick GaOx layer, current blocking effects are visible in the current-voltage curves. On the contrary, a thinner ITO tends to result in thinner GaOx layer and no current blocking is observed.
Links and sources
Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?
Power for Solar can prepare a custom solar energy literature review, simulation code map, dataset map, and B2B photovoltaic technology assessment.
Request B2B research
Comments