One cluster, two clusters, no cluster? -- The curious case of HSC 2686 and Lynga 3

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the Power for Solar editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为光伏效率、钙钛矿太阳能电池、储能技术、太阳能热利用、BIPV、并网技术等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

This study was motivated by the search for Planetary Nebulae (PNe) and Open Cluster (OCs) associations. Only 5 PNe are currently in Galactic OCs among the previous $\sim4,800$ OCs known. They are valuable because as cluster members their properties can be linked to their progenitor stars, something not possible for general field PNe. Since the GAIA astrometric satellite first data release, thousands of new OC candidates have been identified. This offers fresh motivation to search them as hosts for known PNe. Statistically we expect 30 OC-PN pairs to be present. We searched these GAIA candidate OCs, found by Hunt \& Reffert (2023), for known central stars of PNe (CSPNe) as a practical proxy for the PNe themselves and one suited to automated searches. We identified 1 potential CSPN (IRAS 15127-5811) of "Likely" PN [GKF2010] MN18 in the HASH database, as a claimed member of the putative cluster HSC~2686. A second cluster (Lynga~3) with similar parameters and in very close angular proximity could also be a potential host. Here we reclassify CSPN IRAS 15127-5811 as a blue supergiant with a surrounding bi-polar nebula. Nevertheless, we collected all available information on proposed member stars for both these clusters. We conclude that neither claimed cluster is real. Our results shed considerable doubt on the veracity of many newly identified OCs that have modest numbers of stellar members.

Links and sources

• Official / arXiv page
• PDF from original source

Comments