Who uses online electricity monitoring services? The role of household attitudes and characteristics

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the Power for Solar editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为光伏效率、钙钛矿太阳能电池、储能技术、太阳能热利用、BIPV、并网技术等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Smart meters and digital platforms enable electricity companies to provide online services that allow households to monitor hourly electricity use and billing. These services may support demand-side flexibility and consumer engagement, but adoption patterns remain poorly understood. This study examines the attitudinal, socio-demographic, and dwelling-related factors influencing the use of an electricity company's online electricity monitoring service in Finland, where smart metering is nearly universal. Survey data collected in 2018 from 1277 Finnish households were analyzed using logit regression models, with attitudinal constructs identified through factor analysis. The results show that adoption is more likely among households that are more technologically oriented, risk-tolerant, and less influenced by peer opinions. Homeownership, detached housing, and time-of-use contracts also increased adoption, whereas income and higher education were not significant predictors. Environmental concern is negatively associated with registration, indicating that environmentally oriented attitudes do not necessarily translate into engagement with digital electricity monitoring services. These results suggest that online services primarily attract households with stronger digital interest and more direct practical incentives to monitor electricity use, while less engaged households may remain outside the user base. For online platforms to deliver on their potential of wider engagement in energy matters, utilities and policymakers need strategies to broaden adoption and focus on increasing awareness of service benefits, simplifying user interfaces, providing personalized feedback and targeted communication for less digitally engaged households.

Links and sources

• PDF from original source

Comments